AI Review Tool

CS Content Clarity

Paste in your course content, upload a screenshot, or upload a PDF — and get fast, structured feedback on clarity, alignment, and learner experience — before it goes live.

Whether you're a solo ID, part of an L&D team, or a subject matter expert building your first course, CS Content Clarity helps you catch what you might miss and ship content you feel confident about.

Already paid or have an Unlimited subscription? Enter the email you used at checkout and we'll send you a 6-digit code to unlock your full access.

C
CS Content Clarity
No account required
Session only — nothing stored
No data retained

Get a thoughtful review
of your course content or slides

Answer a few questions, submit your content, and receive actionable feedback — no account, no login, no data kept.

Powered by Claude, Anthropic's AI.

Step 1 — select one *
What type of content are you submitting for review?
📄
Single page or lesson
One page, activity, or topic
Assignment or assessment
Quiz, discussion, submission
🖥️
Slide deck
Training, lecture, or self-paced slides
📚
Module or unit
A full section of a course
🎓
Full course overview
Full structure, shell, or curriculum plan
Step 2 — select one *
What is your primary goal for this review?
Improve clarity for students
Check alignment between objectives and activities
Prepare for a formal QM review
General quality check before publishing
Other
Step 3 — select one *
Which review framework would you like to use?
💡
Online ed best practices
Broad, accessible review using widely accepted principles of online course design.
🏅
QM-informed review
Structured, deeper analysis informed by publicly available Quality Matters principles.
Step 4 — select one *
Who is this course designed for?
Undergraduate students
Graduate students
Adult / professional learners
Faculty or staff
Other
Step 5 — optional, select all that apply
Which areas should the review focus on?
Learning objectives
Clarity, measurability, and use of action verbs
Clarity of instructions
Are expectations clear and unambiguous for learners?
Alignment
Do objectives, activities, and assessments connect?
Cognitive load
Is content chunked and paced to support learning?
Instructor presence
Does the instructor's voice, tone, and guidance come through?
Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA)
Alt text, color contrast, heading structure — flags potential issues only
Student engagement
Variety, interaction, and motivation built into the design
Technology use
Are tools appropriate, necessary, and accessible to learners?
Step 6
Submit your content for review

Choose one option below. Switching tabs will clear your current input.

Paste as much as you have — more content means more specific feedback.

Your content is processed only for this review and is not stored.

Step 7 — optional
No account or login required
All content deleted when tab closes
Nothing stored, saved, or shared
Powered by AI — your content is not stored.
Please agree to the Terms of Service to continue