Look Again™ by CS Learning Solutions
Your course. Fresh eyes.
Look Again gives you fast, structured feedback on course content before learners ever see it. Catch alignment gaps, unclear instructions, and accessibility issues while they're still easy to fix.
No account needed · We don't store your content · Built by a QM Certified Peer Reviewer
Three steps. No setup.
- 1
Add your content
Paste text, upload a PDF, or drop in a screenshot. A module, a syllabus, a slide deck, whatever you're working on.
- 2
Choose your lens
Review against general instructional design best practices, or use the QM-informed review.
- 3
Get your fixes
A clear report covering alignment, clarity, accessibility, strengths, and what to improve first.
See what you'll get.
Every full report covers seven areas: Overall Summary, Alignment Check, Clarity & Instructions, Best Practices Review, Accessibility & Usability, Strengths, and Suggested Improvements.
Suggested improvements
The first three high-priority fixes from the sample report.
- High priorityCorrect the factual error about mitochondria
Reading 4.1 states 'Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells contain mitochondria'—this is incorrect. Prokaryotic cells do NOT have mitochondria (membrane-bound organelles). This error directly contradicts the table above it and is a fundamental biology concept. Revise to clarify that only eukaryotic cells have mitochondria.
- High priorityAdd alt text to all images
Provide descriptive alt text for Cell A and Cell B diagrams. Example: 'Cell A: Large circular eukaryotic cell with visible nucleus (large purple circle), two oval mitochondria, and scattered ribosomes. Cell B: Small rod-shaped prokaryotic cell with no visible nucleus, showing scattered ribosomes and DNA region.' This is essential for WCAG compliance and learning equity.
- High priorityProvide detailed lab report requirements and rubric
Create a rubric or detailed instructions specifying: required sections (introduction, hypothesis, methods, results, discussion, conclusion), expected length, formatting requirements, point allocation, and how each learning objective will be assessed. Consider providing a sample lab report or template. Without this, the 50-point assignment has unclear expectations.
One of the seven sections from a real Look Again report on a sample biology module.
Built for the people who make learning happen.
Instructional designers and QA reviewers
A solid first pass before your full review, so your time goes to the judgment calls.
Faculty
A second look at your course before the term starts, without waiting on a review cycle.
L&D and training teams
Check that objectives, content, and assessments actually line up.
Look Again is a starting point, not a replacement for professional judgment. It helps you see what to look at. You decide what to do about it.
Hi, I'm Cheray.
I've spent more than 20 years in learning and development, starting in music education, and I'm a QM Certified Peer Reviewer. I've reviewed a lot of courses. Most AI tools help you create content. Almost nothing helps you evaluate what you already have. So I built Look Again.
When the report shows you what to fix and you want help fixing it, that's what CS Learning Solutions does. I work with higher ed institutions, educators, and organizations on course design, reviews, and redesigns.